Re: Win32 defines

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 defines
Date: 2003-04-18 01:04:18
Message-ID: 200304180104.h3I14IT19518@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


OK, patch attached and applied.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > OK, I have modified the patch to match your suggestions. I also removed
> > the N_PLAT_NLM define because I think that just got in when we were
> > thinking about the Novell port that we cancelled. Is that correct?
>
> Could you use HAVE_WORKING_LINK instead of HAVE_LINK? The symbol names
> containing _WORKING_ are sort of standard for cases where the function
> exists but doesn't really work well.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 11.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-04-18 03:17:20 Win32 patch for COPY
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-04-18 00:21:22 Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?