Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol
Date: 2003-04-15 20:36:52
Message-ID: 200304152036.h3FKaqx06256@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

Tom Lane wrote:
> Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com> writes:
> > This all sounds great. I am really looking to seeing all of this
> > implemented. Are you still on schedule for getting this into 7.4?
>
> I gotta get off my duff and get with it, but I still plan to do it.

I am wondering if the wondering if the start of 7.5 may not be a better
time for such a massive change, and to give interfaces time to catch up.

Also, is Patrick going to need your help for PITR in 7.4?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-04-15 20:42:42 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2003-04-15 20:31:18 Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-04-15 20:42:42 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-15 14:17:27 Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias