Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Tech Docs and Consultants

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, elein(at)varlena(dot)com,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
Date: 2003-04-14 14:29:49
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Robert Treat wrote:

> On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 23:38, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > However, I can only reasonably manage Techdocs if it's on a production-ready
> > > Content Management System, with simplified page editing, multi-user rights
> > > management, and revision history.   I have investigated this extensively, and
> > > there are *no* production-ready, pure OSS, CMS for PostgreSQL running on PHP
> > > or Perl.  I was looking at developing one with Andy Chase (based on his
> > > "SnapSnap"), but then he got a job and Zapatec announced the launch of Bloki.
> >
> > What's wrong with Bricolage?
> >
> > Chris
> >
> Actually I'm still waiting to here what was wrong with the current plan
> to move the site to the zope/wiki engine...

With Justin not driving it, was anyone going to step up to the plate and
do so?  So far, only person step up to try and fill Justin's shoes has
been Josh ...

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Richard HuxtonDate: 2003-04-14 14:43:16
Subject: Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
Previous:From: gregDate: 2003-04-14 13:48:45
Subject: Re: Tech Docs and Consultants

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group