Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ...
Date: 2003-03-20 16:58:25
Message-ID: 200303201658.h2KGwPN11971@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
> >> Do you think we should replace them all with a utility called pg_maintain
> >> that can do all of them?
>
> > If you ask me, we could get rid of them completely because
> > for d in $(psql -l --somthing); do vacuum $d; done
> > seems perfectly fine.
>
> If you have a real shell (and know how to use it), sure. Is such a
> solution acceptable to all those Windows users we're hoping to attract?

That's why I am thinking of some wrapper that will loop through the
databases and run psql commands.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-03-20 17:22:28 Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-03-20 16:55:09 Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ...

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-03-20 17:22:28 Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-03-20 16:55:09 Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ...