Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Read Committed isolation

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oliver Crow <ocrow(at)simplexity(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: Read Committed isolation
Date: 2003-03-18 00:57:12
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
I guess the big question is whether we want to be teaching isolation
level concepts in our manual.  It is a standard database concept.


Oliver Crow wrote:
> Hi all,
> It seems to me that the PostgreSQL user's manual could be clearer on the
> consequences of using the Read Committed isolation level.
> It says "The partial transaction isolation provided by Read Committed
> mode is adequate for many applications" ... "However, for applications
> that do complex queries and updates, it may be necessary to guarantee a
> more rigorously consistent view of the database".
> It does not say what types of transactions will cause problems in Read
> Committed mode, or what the consequences of those problems might be.
> This is a point on which the manual ought to be explicit ... the potential
> for intermittent creation of database inconsistencies is serious. For
> example, if information from a select is passed via the application to an
> update, the transaction could reintroduce stale information.
> This message provides some good explanation with examples:
> It also speaks clearly about when a serializable transaction may need to
> be repeated, and the possible trade off between using serializable or
> SELECT FOR UPDATE.  Could an edited version of that message be included in
> the manual?  (I'd be willing to assist with editing)
> Thanks, Oliver
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: CharlyBrDate: 2003-03-19 23:04:08
Subject: postgresql version for a function
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-03-17 19:44:06
Subject: Re: FAQ link corrections, replacement to prev. patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group