Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: No entry to pg_hba.conf

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: "Roman Fail" <rfail(at)posportal(dot)com>,"Fabiano" <fcostola(at)osite(dot)com(dot)br>, <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No entry to pg_hba.conf
Date: 2003-03-12 16:12:05
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-support
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 11:00, Roman Fail wrote:
> I'm not a TCP/IP networking expert, but I'm pretty certain that 10.x.x.x
> addresses are the very definition of a private non-routable Class A
> network.  Which means the subnet mask should be

> is the mask for Class C networks, which for private networks
> are generally defined as 192.168.x.x.

Minor correction.  With CIDR you can use any netmask with any private IP 
ranges.  Using 10.x.x.x within an organization allows tremendous flexibility 
in subnetting.  I use that here, to great effect.
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

pgadmin-support by date

Next:From: Michiel LangeDate: 2003-03-13 06:56:44
Subject: Re: Cannot edit group-properties
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2003-03-12 16:10:38
Subject: Re: No entry to pg_hba.conf

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group