Re: No entry to pg_hba.conf 10.17.11.16

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: "Roman Fail" <rfail(at)posportal(dot)com>, "Fabiano" <fcostola(at)osite(dot)com(dot)br>, <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No entry to pg_hba.conf 10.17.11.16
Date: 2003-03-12 16:12:05
Message-ID: 200303121112.05719.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-support

On Wednesday 12 March 2003 11:00, Roman Fail wrote:
> I'm not a TCP/IP networking expert, but I'm pretty certain that 10.x.x.x
> addresses are the very definition of a private non-routable Class A
> network. Which means the subnet mask should be 255.0.0.0.

> 255.255.255.0 is the mask for Class C networks, which for private networks
> are generally defined as 192.168.x.x.

Minor correction. With CIDR you can use any netmask with any private IP
ranges. Using 10.x.x.x within an organization allows tremendous flexibility
in subnetting. I use that here, to great effect.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Browse pgadmin-support by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michiel Lange 2003-03-13 06:56:44 Re: Cannot edit group-properties
Previous Message Dave Page 2003-03-12 16:10:38 Re: No entry to pg_hba.conf 10.17.11.16