Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Error codes revisited

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Error codes revisited
Date: 2003-03-05 16:05:21
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 11:04:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> There is still barely enough time to do the long-threatened protocol
> revision for 7.4, if we suck it up and get started on that now.  I've
> been avoiding the issue myself, because it seems generally boring and
> thankless work, but maybe it's time to face up to it?

Given the repeatedly-asked-for functionalities (like error codes)
for which the stopper has been the long-threatened protocol revision,
I'd think it might be boring, but would hardly be thankless. Heck, I'd
expect a few whoops of joy around the lists.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2003-03-05 16:07:04
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Non-colliding auto generated names
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2003-03-05 15:50:03
Subject: Re: XML ouput for psql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group