From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc(at)mega-bucks(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Basic SQL join question |
Date: | 2003-01-31 14:53:22 |
Message-ID: | 20030131065003.U44779-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> Sorry for this simple question but I can't seem to get Postgres to do
> what I want ...
>
> I want to get the concatenation of 2 or more tables with absolutely
> nothing in common. How can I do this?
>
> For example
>
> Table a:
>
> a
> -----
> a1
> a2
> a3
>
> Table b:
>
> b
> -----
> b1
> b2
>
> Table c:
>
> c
> -----
> c1
> c2
> c3
> c4
>
> What is the proper SQL to return:
>
> a | b | c
> ---------------
> a1 b1 c1
> a2 b2 c2
> a3 c3
> c4
>
I can't think of a real SQL solution (although there might be
one). A pl function could do this but it'd be a little wierd
probably. Note that unless those tables are really selects with
ordering the results are pretty indeterminate and probably
meaningless since order is not guaranteed.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Childs | 2003-01-31 15:19:29 | History |
Previous Message | Berend Tober | 2003-01-31 14:39:41 | What is the benefit of schemas? |