Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: libpqxx: Cursors needed??!

From: "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Key88 SF <key88sf(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpqxx: Cursors needed??!
Date: 2003-01-19 14:17:14
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:51:22PM +0000, Key88 SF wrote:
> It's not clear to me when to use the Cursor class, if at all. Transactions 
> seem to execute fine and I get valid Result classes back without using 
> cursors. 

There's no special reason why you should use Cursor to retrieve
results--you can always just call TransactionItf::Exec() and get
Results from that.  Use Cursor only when you want to create an
SQL cursor.

> Many of the sample programs don't use them either.
The sample programs were mostly written in the order in which they're
numbered, so some of them predate cursors.

> Are cursors needed at all??

No.  It's a convenience class; you can always just execute the
cursor-related commands by hand.  The wrapper class just gives you
conveniences like additional compiler checking, more specific error
messages, more user-friendly syntax, and absolute positioning.  The
latter may be a little harder to do for yourself than it seems,
because of the way postgres returns tuple counts when moving or
fetching with a cursor.


In response to

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Jeroen T. VermeulenDate: 2003-01-19 14:18:55
Subject: Re: libpq C library Client Interface - select()
Previous:From: D'Arcy J.M. CainDate: 2003-01-19 02:59:00
Subject: Re: Database backup

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group