Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ?

From: Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Bruno Baguette" <bruno(dot)baguette(at)netcourrier(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ?
Date: 2003-01-18 16:05:08
Message-ID: 200301181705.08479.barwick@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Saturday 18 January 2003 14:50, Bruno Baguette wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does somebody knows why this eWeek article that does a benchmark of
> theses Databases (DB2 7.2 ,SQL Server, MySQL,Oracle9i and ASE) whithout
> having added PostgreSQL ?
>
> Here's the URL of the article :
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,293,00.asp

No idea, but this seems to be the same article MySQL features
prominently at the top of their homepage.

Ian Barwick
barwick(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2003-01-19 00:29:18 PostgreSQL background image?
Previous Message Bruno Baguette 2003-01-18 13:50:17 Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ?