| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare) |
| Date: | 2002-12-20 17:46:39 |
| Message-ID: | 200212201746.gBKHkeR18222@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > Good catch. Hmm this may be a serious problem because
> > there's no way to know the row count when we use EXECUTE
> > statements.
>
> I wonder if EXECUTE could/should be made to return the appropriate
> command status string for the executed statement, instead of "EXECUTE".
I think it should return "EXECUTE" with the counts from the commands.
Does that make sense?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-20 17:56:55 | Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-20 14:36:55 | EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-20 17:56:55 | Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-20 14:36:55 | EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare) |