Re: [BUGS] Bug #718: request for improvement of /? to show

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > OK, new output attached. Does the HTML section look silly now with only
> > two entries?
>
> Yeah. I think it should be folded into "Formatting", since it really is
> only an output-formatting option.
>
> I have a problem with the "Query Buffer" section, also: I don't think
> \i, \o, etc have anything to do with the query buffer. Could we split
> this section into "Query Buffer" (\g \r \e \p \w) and "I/O Redirection"
> (\i \o \s), or something like that? Perhaps \copy could go into the
> redirection section too, rather than suffering a shotgun wedding with
> the large-object commands.

OK, I have created an "I/O Redirection" section and moved \i and \o
into there. I didn't think \s (history) belonged there. I also
couldn't see \copy as I/O redirection. (It is a shotgun wedding,
though.)

I have moved Formatting above the "shotgun wedding."

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073