Re: nested transactions

Hans-Jrgen Schnig wrote:
> Is there going to be a way to use transactions inside transactions of
> transactions?
> In other words:
>
> BEGIN;
> BEGIN;
> BEGIN;
> BEGIN;
>
> COMMIT;
> COMMIT;
> COMMIT;
> COMMIT;
>
> Is there a way to have some sort of recursive solution with every
> transaction but the first one being a child transaction?
> Is there a way to implement that without too much extra effort?
> I just curious how that could be done.

Sure, nesting will be unlimited.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073