Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Low Budget Performance

From: Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com>
To: eric soroos <eric-psql(at)soroos(dot)net>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Low Budget Performance
Date: 2002-10-29 07:07:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Am Montag, 28. Oktober 2002 22:56 schrieb eric soroos:
> Raid?
> 0 gives better latency if the controller reads from whichever gets the data
> first. It's unclear if IDE or software raid actually does this though. 1
> Gives better throughput, at a cost to latency.
> 5 Like 1 but with redundancy. It's unclear if I'll be able to do this
> without hardware SCSI raid.

Just for the raid part, we've very good expiriences with Raid 10. Performs well and has mirroring. Avoid Raid 5 if possible, write performance will suffer greatly.

	Mario Weilguni

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2002-10-29 13:38:24
Subject: Re: [pgsql-performance] Performance Problems
Previous:From: Shridhar DaithankarDate: 2002-10-29 06:30:45
Subject: Re: Low Budget Performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group