Re: Default cost variables in postgresql.conf

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: PostgreSQL Mailing List <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Default cost variables in postgresql.conf
Date: 2002-10-21 14:16:21
Message-ID: 20021021101621.A19970@mail.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 12:04:58AM -0700, Ludwig Lim wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Are the "cost" variables (e.g.
> random_page_cost,cpu_tuple_cost,cpu_index_tuple_cost)
> in postgresql.conf optimal for a particular set of
> platform / hardware requirements? (i.e. the configs

Not exactly. They're best guesses. If you check the admin guide,
you'll see that there's a note about these which says that there is
not a well-defined method for calculating these things, so you are
encouraged to experiment and share your findings. They _are_ known
to be conservative defaults, like everything else in the system.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ludwig Lim 2002-10-22 11:47:38 Selective usage of index in planner/optimizer (Too conservative?)
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2002-10-21 13:00:25 Re: Self-generating statistics?