Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> OK, personally, I would like to see an actual speedup of PostgreSQL
> >> queries before I would apply such a OS-specific, version-specific
> >> patch.
> > Don't be silly. A performance improvement is a performance
> > improvement.
> No, Bruce was saying that he wanted to see demonstrable improvement
> *due to this specific change* before committing to support a
> platform-specific API. I agree with him, actually. If you do the
> TLB code and can't measure any meaningful performance improvement
> when using it vs. when not, I'd not be excited about cluttering the
> distribution with it.
> > I think it's at least worth implementing -- if it doesn't provide a
> > noticeable performance improvement, then we don't need to merge it.
> You're on the same page, you just don't realize it...
I see what he thought I said, I just can't figure out how he read it
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-09-29 21:53:33|
|Subject: Re: Do we want a CVS branch now?|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-09-29 21:27:58|
|Subject: Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP|