Re: Installation location of DLLs

From: Jason Tishler <jason(at)tishler(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Installation location of DLLs
Date: 2002-09-16 15:29:01
Message-ID: 20020916152900.GB424@tishler.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwin

Peter,

[Sorry for the sluggish response time, but I just returned from
vacation...]

On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:39:17PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Jason Tishler writes:
> > I actually recommended this (via a patch) in the past, but it was
> > vetoed by you. :,) I have been post-processing "make install" ever
> > since. I would be very happy if you would reconsider this position.
>
> I remember. I'm not saying that I like this very much, but if there's
> reputable precedent we might as well go along with it.

I'm not sure whether this qualifies as a "reputable precedent," but
AFAICT most (if not all) Cygwin packages following this recommendation.

> OTOH, we currently don't have a clean way to distinguish between
> imported and dlopen'able DLLs in the build system, so I'm not sure how
> to implement this cleanly.

You would probably know the cleanest way. However if you wish, I will
try to dig up my old patch.

Thanks,
Jason

In response to

Browse pgsql-cygwin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Tishler 2002-09-16 15:41:28 Re: service start script
Previous Message Jason Tishler 2002-09-16 15:22:05 Re: PostgreSQL unsuitable for large datasets?