Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas

From: terry <tg5027(at)citlink(dot)net>
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas
Date: 2002-09-04 19:25:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
>>  > >>  Hm... In MS Access it is called 'Relations' which sounds kind
>>  > >> of correct.
>>  >
>>  > Actually, the window is called "Relationships", not
>>  > "Relations"....
>>  Correct. Was lazy to look it up. Does this change something?

Not really, I was just following up on the discussion about the 
incorrect use of the term Relations by MS Access.  I don't think that 
Relationships is a bad tab label - except that it's a bit long for the 
current size tabs :).

Access's Relationships are all placed on one canvas, regardless of 
whether or not there are several independent diagrams present.  If this 
model is to be used by pgaccess, it would make just as much sense to 
put 'Relationships' into the Database menu instead of a tab, since the 
New, Open, and Design actions would not mean anything.

the-$0.02-of-an-old-Access-developer-wishing-the-best-to-pgaccess ...


In response to


pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Iavor RaytchevDate: 2002-09-04 19:43:10
Subject: Re: the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas
Previous:From: terryDate: 2002-09-04 18:36:25
Subject: Re: the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group