Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: contrib features during beta period

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib features during beta period
Date: 2002-08-30 13:14:35
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Friday 30 August 2002 12:49 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > Is it ok if Florian and I submit the improvements to the fulltextindex
> > contrib during beta?

> What improvements are we talking about here?  FTI is sufficiently widely
> depended on that I think it ought to follow the same quality standard
> as the main backend ... viz, "no new features during beta".

Does this mean we should be looking for a way to integrate it into the main 
backend at this point?  Isn't that what contrib is for?
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-08-30 13:29:28
Subject: Re: contrib features during beta period
Previous:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2002-08-30 12:04:14
Subject: Re: tweaking MemSet() performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group