Re: contrib features during beta period

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib features during beta period
Date: 2002-08-30 13:14:35
Message-ID: 200208300914.35240.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday 30 August 2002 12:49 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > Is it ok if Florian and I submit the improvements to the fulltextindex
> > contrib during beta?

> What improvements are we talking about here? FTI is sufficiently widely
> depended on that I think it ought to follow the same quality standard
> as the main backend ... viz, "no new features during beta".

Does this mean we should be looking for a way to integrate it into the main
backend at this point? Isn't that what contrib is for?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-30 13:29:28 Re: contrib features during beta period
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2002-08-30 12:04:14 Re: tweaking MemSet() performance