Re: [HACKERS] fix for palloc() of user-supplied length

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fix for palloc() of user-supplied length
Date: 2002-08-29 01:15:10
Message-ID: 200208290115.g7T1FA029428@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


It will, if a patch is supplied. Anything significant that is mentioned
in the CVS logs gets shown in the release notes.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> > > > Anyone want to argue that we should keep the v0 protocol support any
> > > > longer?
> > >
> > > Nope, exactly the same thought crossed my mind while I was reading
> > > through the code...
> >
> > Feel free to rip it out.
>
> Should probably be mentioned in the release notes.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-29 01:16:06 Re: VIRUS IN YOUR MAIL (W32/Klez.h@MM)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-29 01:14:16 Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-29 01:19:54 Re: Concern about memory management with SRFs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-29 00:28:19 Re: create or replace rule/view (fwd)