Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> ... My own opinion is
> >> that there is nothing broken there; certainly nothing so broken that
> >> we need to force a change under schedule pressure.
> > I don't feel we are under pressure. We have time to discuss and address
> > it.
> Well, it's all a matter of how you look at it. Isn't the point of your
> post that began this thread to start giving people a sense of time
> I agree that if we could quickly come to a resolution about how this
> ought to work, there's plenty of time to go off and implement it. But
> (1) we failed to come to a consensus before, so I'm not optimistic
> than one will suddenly emerge now; (2) we've got a ton of other issues
> that we *need* to deal with before beta. This one does not strike me
> as a must-fix, and so I'm loathe to spend much development time on it
> when there are so many open issues.
Well, it is up to the individuals involved. If someone wants to deal
with it, and gets a consensus, and comes up with a patch, let them.
The list is for time pressure on those items. It does not affect new
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Curt Sampson||Date: 2002-07-31 04:36:44|
|Subject: Re: WAL file location|
|Previous:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2002-07-31 04:35:13|
|Subject: Re: Outer join differences|