| From: | nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway) |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: lock listing |
| Date: | 2002-07-23 22:47:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20020723224718.GA11484@klamath.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 05:52:39PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I agree with Peter that it is better to rename it pg_lock*. The show
> isn't needed and it makes it look more like our other system info
> tables.
Well, it's not a system info table -- it's a built-in function, and I'm
not aware of any naming conventions for those. Personally, I find it a
bit confusing to do:
SELECT * FROM pg_tables;
SELECT * FROM pg_class;
/* ... */
SELECT * FROM pg_locks();
However, I'm not really worried about the name, so I've changed it
to pg_locks() -- a revised patch is attached.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| lock-listing-13.patch | text/plain | 17.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-23 23:13:52 | Re: Fk fix for noaction update/delete |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-23 22:18:16 | Re: Table Function API doc patch |