Re: lock listing

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: lock listing
Date: 2002-07-20 00:07:52
Message-ID: 200207200007.g6K07q325405@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 01:21:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Why does this patch arbitrarily remove the #ifdefs and documentation
> > for USER_LOCKS? That seems quite unrelated to the stated purpose.
>
> I probably should have mentioned that -- it looked like dead code,
> and the behavior that it referred to (a loadable module called
> user-locks.c, which doesn't make sense to begin with) doesn't
> appear to exist anymore.

Is it contrib/userlock/?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-20 00:17:14 Re: prepareable statements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-07-19 21:15:43 Re: lock listing