| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CLUSTER patch |
| Date: | 2002-07-18 15:10:38 |
| Message-ID: | 200207181510.g6IFAc411890@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
>
> Given that this patch is specifically stated not to work:
>
> >> Anyway, there's still a big problem with this patch: the pg_depend
> >> information gets messed up after CLUSTER, so a clustered table cannot be
> >> dropped. I don't know why is this.
Wow, that is strange since it has the same oid as before.
> I object to it being applied now.
Oh, I didn't see that part of his message; will remove from queue. I
know I was waiting to hear if the proper way to drop the temp table was
using object drop or drop it directly.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-18 15:11:53 | Re: CLUSTER patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-18 13:39:50 | Re: Between Node |