Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
> Given that this patch is specifically stated not to work:
> >> Anyway, there's still a big problem with this patch: the pg_depend
> >> information gets messed up after CLUSTER, so a clustered table cannot be
> >> dropped. I don't know why is this.
Wow, that is strange since it has the same oid as before.
> I object to it being applied now.
Oh, I didn't see that part of his message; will remove from queue. I
know I was waiting to hear if the proper way to drop the temp table was
using object drop or drop it directly.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-07-18 15:11:53|
|Subject: Re: CLUSTER patch|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2002-07-18 13:39:50|
|Subject: Re: Between Node |