Re: rename() vs. link(); building from source

Barry,

On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:12:46PM -0500, Barry Pederson wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> >On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:37:11AM -0500, Barry Pederson wrote:
> >
> >>[snip]
> >>Repeat the create/restore/drop sequence 6 times, no crash :)
> >
> >Thanks for the above.
> >
> >Can either David or you submit the patch? See my previous emails for
> >the details.
>
> Umm..ok Not sure what details from previous emails you mean, or if I saw
> them. So if you could let me know what I need to do, I'll take a whack at
> it.

I have decided to submit the patch myself -- sorry, for the gyrations.
I generally only submit patches that I create and test myself, but I will
make an exception and just point to David and your work in the archives.
Hopefully, this is acceptable by the core PostgreSQL developers.

> [ subscribe to pgsql-patches and just post the patch along with an
> explanation of what it fixes? or do I have to go whole-hog and do it over
> again with a copy of current source from CVS? :(

Yes, the above is the procedure. But, possibly all you would need to do is
replace postgres.exe from the standard Cygwin PostgreSQL with the one
from the CVS build and test.

> Oh yeah, BTW, I ran "make check" against the patched 7.2.1, and it passed
> all 79 tests on my box, FWIW.

Good.

BTW, you were most likely "lucky." Normally, make check will fail
due to connection refused errors unless you are on a server version
of NT/2000/XP. See the README for more details, if interested.

Thanks,
Jason