Re: Bug #638: Buggy select statment with numeric

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: <mailing-list(at)urbanet(dot)ch>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug #638: Buggy select statment with numeric
Date: 2002-04-22 14:29:11
Message-ID: 20020422072554.K81937-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs


On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote:

> Florian Steffen (mailing-list(at)urbanet(dot)ch) reports a bug with a severity of 3
> The lower the number the more severe it is.
>
> Short Description
> Buggy select statment with numeric
>
> Long Description
> A select statement with a where clause on a numeric column tested
> for equality against null always return empty result. With ISNULL
> everything is fine, but not with the = operator.

This is correct behavior. NULL=NULL is unknown not true. Older versions
had a hack to make an explicit =NULL the same as IS NULL for certain
clients that emitted such statements when they meant IS NULL. This is now
off by default but can be turned on using the set variable
TRANSFORM_NULL_EQUALS.

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-04-22 14:56:05 Re: 7.2.1: pg_dump of UNIONed VIEWs broken
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-04-22 14:19:25 Re: Bug #638: Buggy select statment with numeric