From: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "John Proctor" <jproctor(at)prium(dot)net> |
Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
Date: | 2002-04-16 16:04:37 |
Message-ID: | 20020416120437.3e68fcff.nconway@klamath.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-sql |
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 23:49:21 -0500
"John Proctor" <jproctor(at)prium(dot)net> wrote:
> However, none of the above is of any value if the performance penalty is
> large. And PL/pgSQL needs much more that just the param number increased.
John,
Could you elaborate on what enhancements you'd like to see in PL/pgSQL?
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-04-16 16:10:56 | Foreign Key woes -- 7.2 and ~7.3 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-04-16 15:51:13 | Re: experimental pg_qcache patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-04-16 16:54:13 | Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-04-16 14:35:51 | Re: libpq, psql hungarian translation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-04-16 19:12:52 | Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
Previous Message | KeithR | 2002-04-16 14:10:17 | help - JOIN problem |