Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Date: 2002-03-26 05:20:41
Message-ID: 200203260520.g2Q5Kf610032@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > > Is this right, or should "majorversion" still be 7.2? Right offhand
> > > the latter seems correct ...
> >
> > I wasn't sure what to do here. I figured if the docs were regenerated,
> > it should say 7.2.1, and if they aren't, then they will stay as 7.2.
>
> But neither explanation warrants setting "majorversion" to 7.2.1.

Why? Why shouldn't the documentation match the release number?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-03-26 05:23:19 Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-26 05:09:37 Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...