Vadim Kogan wrote:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Ok. I've been a little bit out of the loop lately.
> a) The original changes I had were made out of two parts:
> - inet_*_* part
> - postgres-specific part
> b) I have made some choices there as to how to show/input things.
> Basically, any valid representation is understood. The output
> is as close as possible to the similar IPv4 outputs. Also, the
> the most compact version is used (but that's in inet_*_*).
> If somebody has my original patches (WITH postgres-specific stuff), that'd
> probably be a good starting point. In any case, I will try to produce
> another diff today or sometime during this weekend. I will omit any changes
> to inet_*_*, since bind now has proper version (and moreover, that version
> is not the same as mine, since Paul rewrote some of the stuff).
Vadim, I just sent over the patch Paul submitted. Is that it? If not,
was your patch ever applied to the PostgreSQL CVS? If so, I can find it
using cvs diff -c and send it to you. Do you remember a rough date or
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Paul Vixie||Date: 2002-02-22 19:34:03|
|Subject: Re: IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types. |
|Previous:||From: Vadim Kogan||Date: 2002-02-22 19:12:48|
|Subject: Re: IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types.|