Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "Joe Conway (wwc)" <jconway(at)cox(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
Date: 2002-01-25 16:52:04
Message-ID: 200201251652.g0PGq4L23522@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This would be a *whole* lot simpler if we forgot the notion of "any"
> > > and made the search order look like
> > >
> > > (temp, private, public, system)
>
> I am starting to see the advantages and like it. I also like the exact
> name "public" for the public schema.

I wonder if we should think about a 'group' area so people in a group
can create things that others in the group can see, but not people
outside the group.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2002-01-25 16:55:02 Re: new module contrib/tree for 7.2 ?
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2002-01-25 16:50:56 Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL