Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > This would be a *whole* lot simpler if we forgot the notion of "any"
> > > and made the search order look like
> > >
> > > (temp, private, public, system)
> I am starting to see the advantages and like it. I also like the exact
> name "public" for the public schema.
I wonder if we should think about a 'group' area so people in a group
can create things that others in the group can see, but not people
outside the group.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Don Baccus||Date: 2002-01-25 16:55:02|
|Subject: Re: new module contrib/tree for 7.2 ?|
|Previous:||From: Stephan Szabo||Date: 2002-01-25 16:50:56|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL|