Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "Joe Conway (wwc)" <jconway(at)cox(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
Date: 2002-01-25 16:52:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > This would be a *whole* lot simpler if we forgot the notion of "any"
> > > and made the search order look like
> > > 
> > > 	(temp, private, public, system)
> I am starting to see the advantages and like it. I also like the exact 
> name "public" for the public schema.

I wonder if we should think about a 'group' area so people in a group
can create things that others in the group can see, but not people
outside the group.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Don BaccusDate: 2002-01-25 16:55:02
Subject: Re: new module contrib/tree for 7.2 ?
Previous:From: Stephan SzaboDate: 2002-01-25 16:50:56
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group