Re: postgresql.conf syntax

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql.conf syntax
Date: 2002-01-04 05:50:12
Message-ID: 200201040550.g045oCf29015@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Someone on IRC was confused by the contents of postgresql.conf:
>
> #ifdef USE_ASSERT_CHECKING
> #debug_assertions = true
> #endif
>
> I have to say I was confused myself. The #ifdef and #end are merely
> comments, while appears like that syntax is supported by PostgreSQL. I
> think we should put just plain comments at the top of each section.
> Objections?

OK, I have replaced #ifdef with # requires. Patch attached and applied.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 1.9 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-04 05:53:44 RC1 time?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-01-04 05:50:08 Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?