Re: More problem with scripts

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: More problem with scripts
Date: 2002-01-03 19:54:58
Message-ID: 200201031954.g03Jswd00388@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Brent Verner wrote:
> [2002-01-03 14:19] Bruce Momjian said:
> |
> | Actually, we can just do:
> |
> | > *)
> | > dbname=$1
> | > [ "$#" -ne 1 ] && usage=1
> |
> | Meaning if they have anything after the dbname, it is an error. This
> | catches flags _after_ the dbname. Seems most of the script have this
> | problem. If people want it fixed, I can easily do it; just give me to
> | go-ahead.
>
> +1
>
> I can't see a reason to /not/ fix something this simple for the 7.2
> release. In general, I think it's best to fix things like this[1]
> "on sight" as opposed to queueing them in TODO where they /might/ sit
> untouched through another release cycle.
>
> [1] meaning problems that require little effort to fix, and whose
> solutions are /very/ localized.

OK, one more +1 and I will get to it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2002-01-03 19:55:10 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Previous Message Brent Verner 2002-01-03 19:51:46 Re: More problem with scripts