Brent Verner wrote:
> [2002-01-03 14:19] Bruce Momjian said:
> | Actually, we can just do:
> | > *)
> | > dbname=$1
> | > [ "$#" -ne 1 ] && usage=1
> | Meaning if they have anything after the dbname, it is an error. This
> | catches flags _after_ the dbname. Seems most of the script have this
> | problem. If people want it fixed, I can easily do it; just give me to
> | go-ahead.
> I can't see a reason to /not/ fix something this simple for the 7.2
> release. In general, I think it's best to fix things like this
> "on sight" as opposed to queueing them in TODO where they /might/ sit
> untouched through another release cycle.
>  meaning problems that require little effort to fix, and whose
> solutions are /very/ localized.
OK, one more +1 and I will get to it.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Hannu Krosing||Date: 2002-01-03 19:55:10|
|Subject: Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem|
|Previous:||From: Brent Verner||Date: 2002-01-03 19:51:46|
|Subject: Re: More problem with scripts|