Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: problems with new vacuum (??)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: problems with new vacuum (??)
Date: 2002-01-02 18:13:32
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> In my experience enabling this feature can make a huge improvement in I/O 
> intensive applications.  Other options can help also, but I find dma to have 
> the largest impact.  I find linux almost unusable without it.

Oh, I should mention my BSD/OS data point is with one SCSI disk, soft
updates and tagged queuing enabled.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Holger KrugDate: 2002-01-02 18:18:06
Subject: Re: Feature proposal: generalizing deferred trigger events
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-02 18:12:03
Subject: Re: problems with new vacuum (??)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group