Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org
Subject: Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Date: 2001-12-30 07:53:09
Message-ID: 20011230165309K.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

> > If you code up a patch, I will test it on my SMP machine using pgbench.
> > Hopefully this will help Tatsuo's 4-way AIX machine too, and Linux.
>
> Attached is a proposed patch (against the current-CVS version of
> lwlock.c). I haven't committed this yet, but it seems to be a win on
> a single CPU. Can people try it on multi CPUs?

Your patches seem lightly enhanced 7.2 performance on AIX 5L (still
slower than 7.1, however).

Attachment Content-Type Size
image/png 6.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-12-30 16:52:58 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-12-30 04:32:11 Constent coding style

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-12-30 16:52:58 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-30 02:42:00 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem