Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Platform Testing - Cygwin

From: Jason Tishler <jason(at)tishler(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "'Hannu Krosing'" <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, "'Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD'" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Platform Testing - Cygwin
Date: 2001-12-17 15:42:01
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-cygwinpgsql-hackers
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 07:47:40PM -0000, Dave Page wrote:
> I believe one of the guys at Greatbridge wroteup some benchmark results
> comparing Cygwin/*nix. I don't know where they can be found though but I've
> got a hunch Jason might have them(?).

All that I can offer is the following:

and specifically:

    On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 05:50:10PM +0000, Terry Carlin wrote:
    > BTW, Up through 40 users, PostgreSQL under CYGWIN using the TPC-C 
    > benchmark performed very much the same as Linux PostgreSQL on the
    > exact hardware.


In response to

pgsql-cygwin by date

Next:From: Anil JangamDate: 2001-12-18 06:13:22
Subject: Setting unique constraints.
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2001-12-17 03:19:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unexpected SIGALRM

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-12-17 15:53:39
Subject: Re: 7.2 is slow?
Previous:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2001-12-17 15:37:16
Subject: Re: 7.2 is slow?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group