From: | Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence |
Date: | 2001-12-16 02:10:05 |
Message-ID: | 20011216021005.GA6948@rcfile.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
[2001-12-15 21:02] Tom Lane said:
| Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> writes:
| > I'm aware that this is not the /best/ solution to this problem, but
| > it is better than the current breakage in pg_dump.
|
| I'd dispute that, primarily because the patch blithely assumes that
| there is no other kind of default value than a serial-created nextval().
| It looks to me like it will either coredump or do the wrong thing
| with other default-value strings.
monkey me! Yes, quite a nasty oversight! I'll clean this up.
thanks.
brent
--
"Develop your talent, man, and leave the world something. Records are
really gifts from people. To think that an artist would love you enough
to share his music with anyone is a beautiful thing." -- Duane Allman
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-12-16 02:12:19 | Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-12-16 02:02:27 | Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-12-16 02:12:19 | Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-12-16 02:02:27 | Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence |