| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, maves(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk |
| Subject: | Re: ecpg - GRANT bug |
| Date: | 2001-10-30 06:50:09 |
| Message-ID: | 200110300650.f9U6o9G24059@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:44:09PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I saw that change from 8 to 7. I think in the ecpg code that the first
> > parameter to cat_str is the number of arguments _after_ the first
> > parameter.
>
> It is indeed.
>
> > so I think the change from 8 -> 7 is correct.
>
> Not exactly. Yes, the cat_str has 7 arguments besides the number, but the
> rule suggests it should have 8.
Sorry, I am lost. The rule above says to count the number of params
after the first one. Doesn't that make it 7?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2001-10-30 07:31:53 | Re: ecpg - GRANT bug |
| Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2001-10-30 06:48:15 | Re: ecpg - GRANT bug |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2001-10-30 07:31:53 | Re: ecpg - GRANT bug |
| Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2001-10-30 06:48:15 | Re: ecpg - GRANT bug |