From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes |
Date: | 2001-10-02 03:40:09 |
Message-ID: | 20011001233901.M77860-100000@mail1.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > <li><a href="http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml">SGML docs
> > > updated every half-hour</a>
> >
> > Ya know, if I'm required to wait 12 hours for *any* source code build to
> > be available to my CVSup'd repository, why should we slap in a bunch of
> > short circuits for the docs? And if this is a valuable thing to do, why
> > short circuit the docs building procedure I've already got on the main
> > machines by pointing the web site off to some other machine?
> >
> > fwiw, one docs building procedure, either ~thomas's, or ~petere's new
> > one, or ~bruce's should be sufficient imho.
> >
> > Since we all seem to be heading off in different directions, we should
> > talk about why that is necessary and try to get headed somewhere
> > productively imho.
>
> I did it because the doc build was down and it was supposedly holding up
> beta. I do think we need more frequent doc builds than 24 hours though.
Since when doe sa doc build, or docs of any kind, hold up beta? docs are
'fluid' up until a week before release,as they have always been ...
last I heard from petere, there were tools that need to be installed, and
were installed, ont eh server for the builds ... Peter, did I miss
something in that, or was it just waiting for ftp.postgresql.org to be on
the new server?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-10-02 04:04:17 | Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes |
Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2001-10-02 02:38:09 | Re: CVS changes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-10-02 04:04:17 | Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes |
Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2001-10-02 02:38:09 | Re: CVS changes |