Patch is in the queue. Seems portability was already tested.
> tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us wrote:
> >Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Is this safe to put into the main code? It looks fine.
> Looks fine to me too, but I suppose you want to know if it works and
> doesn't break anything else...
> The original poster may be able to answer this with more confidence.
> >It looks to me like it'll break compatibility with all pre-8.3 Tcls.
> >Need some #ifdef's in there, no?
> No, I don't think so. It still uses the older "Tcl v1 channel type"
> structure, not the newer one introduced in Tcl 8.3.2. Should be
> OK back through 8.0, although I base this only on an eyeball-check
> of the Tcl 8.0.5 include files.
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2001-09-07 18:25:47|
|Subject: Re: Makefile.PL for Pg.so|
|Previous:||From: Ian Lance Taylor||Date: 2001-09-07 17:00:15|
|Subject: Re: Support building in a different directory on Solaris|
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2001-09-07 18:49:59|
|Subject: Re: What Is The Firing Order?|
|Previous:||From: mike||Date: 2001-09-07 18:24:58|
|Subject: Undefined All PQ keywords|