| From: | tomas(at)fabula(dot)de |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, matthew(dot)copeland(at)honeywell(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Conditional NOTIFY is not implemented |
| Date: | 2001-09-07 14:33:33 |
| Message-ID: | 20010907163333.A25319@www |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:30:44AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> tomas(at)fabula(dot)de writes:
> > My pattern of use for ``CREATE RULE... NOTIFY...'' was [...]
> Yeah, that is the normal and recommended usage pattern for NOTIFY, so
> getting a NOTIFY when nothing actually happened is fairly harmless.
> (Undoubtedly that's why no one complained before.)
>
> Changing the rewriter to error out when it couldn't really Do The Right
> Thing seemed like a good idea at the time, but now it seems clear that
> this didn't do anything to enhance the usefulness of the system. Unless
> someone objects, I'll change it back for 7.2.
>
> regards, tom lane
I won't object ;-)
Thank you again
-- tomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | matthew.copeland | 2001-09-07 14:40:53 | Re: Conditional NOTIFY is not implemented |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-09-07 14:18:05 | Re: parse error: LIMIT combined with UNION |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-09-07 14:37:28 | Re: backend hba.c prob |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-09-07 14:30:02 | Re: Beta Monday? |