Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] JDBC pg_description update needed for CVS tip

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] JDBC pg_description update needed for CVS tip
Date: 2001-09-07 04:30:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-jdbcpgsql-patches
Can someone tackles this and supply a patch?

> Would some JDBC hacker develop a patch for the following issue?  The
> change is just barely large enough that I don't want to commit untested
> code for it --- but not having a Java development environment at hand,
> I can't test the updated code.
> The problem is in (same code in both jdbc1 and
> jdbc2, looks like).  It does direct access to pg_description that isn't
> right anymore.  In getTables, instead of
> 	java.sql.ResultSet dr = connection.ExecSQL("select description from pg_description where objoid="+r.getInt(2));
> it should be
> 	java.sql.ResultSet dr = connection.ExecSQL("select obj_description("+r.getInt(2)+",'pg_class')");
> In getColumns, the change is a little more involved, because
> pg_attribute doesn't have an OID column anymore.  The initial query
> can't fetch a.oid, but should fetch a.attrelid instead, and then the
> pg_description query should become
> 	java.sql.ResultSet dr = connection.ExecSQL("select col_description("+r.getInt(1)+","+r.getInt(5)+")");
> (col_description takes the table OID and the column's attnum).
> The reason this is more than a 3-line change is that it should be done
> either the old way or the new way depending on whether server version >=
> 7.2 or not, for backwards-compatibility of the driver.
> It's possible there are other similar changes needed that I missed in a
> quick lookover.
> So, would some enterprising person fix the JDBC code to work with CVS
> tip, and submit a patch?
> 		thanks, tom lane
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-09-07 04:30:44
Subject: Re: Conditional NOTIFY is not implemented
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-09-07 04:24:14
Subject: Re: byteain bug(?)

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-09-07 04:35:15
Subject: Re: Support building in a different directory on Solaris
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-09-07 01:40:51
Subject: Re: encoding names

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Barry LindDate: 2001-09-07 05:06:28
Subject: Re: JDBC patch procedures (Re: [PATCHES] Patch for jdbc2
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-09-07 02:43:47
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Using char fields with 7.1.3 driver]

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group