Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net, "'Peter T Mount'" <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver
Date: 2001-08-24 15:52:50
Message-ID: 200108241552.f7OFqo003417@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

> So going forward, whose responsibility is it to maintain this file? Is
> it the responsibility of the person submitting the patch (i.e. each
> patch should contain an update to CHANGELOG), or is it the
> responsibility of the person applying the patch?
>

I think it has to be done at release time, like HISTORY.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-24 16:02:30 Re: Bug #424: JDBC driver security issue.
Previous Message Rene Pijlman 2001-08-24 11:41:44 Proposal to fix Statement.executeBatch()