Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: PostgreSQL on Cygwin

From: Terry Carlin <terry(at)greatbridge(dot)com>
To: Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql-Cygwin <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: PostgreSQL on Cygwin
Date: 2001-07-17 15:51:17
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-cygwin
Yes, I would like you to send me the Cygwin DLL.  I downloaded the most 
current snapshot.  The benchmarks that I am doing don't seem to drop any 
tables, but just in case....
It seems that the problem that I was seeing with the handles has indeed 
been fixed.  Was able to run a 20 user benchmark yesterday. This takes 
around three hours.  The throughput seemed to be at least in the 
neighborhood of RedHat 7.1 Linux 2.4.2 kernel. (1100 TPS on a random 
read-only AS3AP query).
I am currently running a 1-100 user TPC-C benchmark.  This will take a 
couple of days to run.  Will let you know how it turns out.


Terry Carlin
Great Bridge, LLC.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 7/16/01, 4:41:28 PM, Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> wrote 
regarding [CYGWIN] Re: PostgreSQL on Cygwin:

> Terry,

> On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 08:28:28PM +0000, Terry Carlin wrote:
> > I guess I confused you. I think the snapshot that Dmitry Yurtaev
> > mentioned was of Cygwin snapshot 20010615 not of PostgreSQL.
> > I am downloading the latest snapshot of Cygwin as I am typing this
> > message.
> > Will publish my results as soon as I can get the testing in.

> Does your testing do any DROP TABLE commands?  If so, then please heed my
> warning below:

> > On 7/16/01, 1:57:22 PM, Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com (Jason Tishler) wrote
> > regarding Re: PostgreSQL on Cygwin:
> >
> > > Unfortunately, there is a bug in the current Cygwin CVS that causes
> > > PostgreSQL to hang during a DROP TABLE. See the following for details:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > I can email you a Cygwin DLL built from Cygwin CVS on 6/28/01 with the
> > > problematic patch already removed or you can use the 6/16/01 snapshot
> > > which is the last official snapshot that does not have this problem.
> > > Either one is after 6/15/01, which Dmitry claims no longer has this
> > > resource leak. Let me know which way you want to go.

> Thanks,
> Jason

> --
> Jason Tishler
> Director, Software Engineering       Phone: 732.264.8770 x235
> Dot Hill Systems Corp.               Fax:   732.264.8798
> 82 Bethany Road, Suite 7             Email: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com
> Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA                 WWW:

> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

In response to


pgsql-cygwin by date

Next:From: Jason TishlerDate: 2001-07-17 18:23:10
Subject: Re: Re: PostgreSQL on Cygwin
Previous:From: Kian ParseeDate: 2001-07-17 13:41:57
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL on Win/2K

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group