Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Volpe <volpe(dot)mark(at)epa(dot)gov>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions
Date: 2001-07-12 18:42:31
Message-ID: 200107121842.f6CIgVX22517@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


Done.

> Might as well just get rid of that one; Peter's right about the security hole.
>
> The simplest fix I see is to allow SET AUTHORIZATION only in superuser-owned
> functions. It would still be potentially useful that way. Doing this the
> "right" way (with users needing regrantable privileges, etc.) would involve
> too much effort for too little reward, IMHO.
>
> Mark
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > I am backing out this SET AUTHORIZATION patch until we can resolve the
> > security issues. It will remain in the patch queue at:
> >
> > http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> >
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-12 19:29:09 Re: [PATCH] Patch to make pg_hba.conf handle virtualhost access control and samehost keyword
Previous Message Mark Volpe 2001-07-12 18:41:01 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions