Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jim Mercer <jim(at)reptiles(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date: 2001-06-26 04:56:04
Message-ID: 200106260456.f5Q4u4Y00723@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:20:40AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > We will do double-crypt and everyone will be happy, right?
> >
> > > if the API as above existed, then i would be happy to see "password" go away
> > > (although it should be depreciated to a --enable option, otherwise you are
> > > going to ruin a bunch of existing code).
> >
> > Who is using it? We can continue to allow it but at some point there is
> > no purpose to it unless you have clients that are pre-7.2. Double-crypt
> > removes the use for it, no?
>
> if the API allows a plain text password, and compares agains a cyrtpo-pg_shadow
> i would imagine that would be fine.
>
> at this point i should apologize for possibly arguing out of turn.
>
> if 7.2 has the above, that is cool.
>
> i'm sorta hoping my mods can make it into 7.1.3, if there is one.

Not a chance. Only major bug fixes in 7.1.X.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-06-26 08:53:04 Re: stuck spin lock with many concurrent users
Previous Message Jim Mercer 2001-06-26 04:51:21 Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords