| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bytea binary compatible |
| Date: | 2001-06-24 21:00:04 |
| Message-ID: | 200106242100.f5OL04s28715@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > OK, code backed out. If the storage formats are the same, doesn't that
> > make them binary compatibile.
Actually, I didn't mean to even apply the bytea patch I backed out. It
accidentally got when I applied RESET ALL and I only realized it later.
I had the diff in a separate file so it was easy to back out.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-25 01:53:51 | Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-24 03:12:41 | Re: Bytea binary compatible |