Re: Patch to include PAM support...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Date: 2001-06-12 16:35:10
Message-ID: 200106121635.f5CGZAM18470@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Is there any interest in PAM support? If not, I will reject this patch.
>
> We have seen multiple requests for PAM support, so there's interest out
> there. But IIRC, I had some serious concerns about this proposed
> implementation.

I know there was concerns about blocking but is that problem any more so
than other interfaces we already support?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-06-12 16:39:09 Re: Australian timezone configure option
Previous Message Vince Roberts 2001-06-12 16:33:51 lo_copy routine

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-06-12 16:39:09 Re: Australian timezone configure option
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-06-12 16:32:12 Re: Patch to include PAM support...