Re: [PORTS] NT service design choices

From: Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fred Yankowski <fred(at)ontosys(dot)com>, pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PORTS] NT service design choices
Date: 2001-05-22 13:18:52
Message-ID: 20010522091852.G125@dothill.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwin pgsql-ports

Tom,

On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 04:50:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> writes:
> >> The last three would seem to be generally useful additions to cygrunsrv
> >> anyway. I'm not sure what you mean by "dependency on other services".
>
> > The SCM will use this information to start/stop services in the right
> > order on system startup/shutdown or to automatically start a dependency
> > if it is not currently running. For example, the Cygwin PostgreSQL
> > (i.e., postmaster) service is dependent on cygipc's ipc-daemon service.
>
> OK ... then that qualifies as a generically useful feature also,
> I should think.

Agreed.

> Surely that's not the only part of the Cygwin Unix
> emulation that's run as a service?

So far inetd and sshd are the only UNIX daemons from the core Cygwin
packages that are typically run as services. I'm sure now that cygrunsrv
has been contributed, there will be a slew of them to follow suit.

Jason

--
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering Phone: 732.264.8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: 732.264.8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-cygwin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message SICEm, s.l. 2001-05-24 02:38:22 Python/Postgres Pygres for Win32 w/o cygwin
Previous Message Ludde Mirko 2001-05-22 08:44:23 AW: Re: Problems with Installing postgres on Cygwin

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tegge, Bernd 2001-05-22 13:30:18 Re: Re: pgsql + qnx
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-22 12:07:00 Re: Re: pgsql + qnx