Re: Re: GIST question

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: GIST question
Date: 2001-05-15 21:50:44
Message-ID: 200105152150.f4FLojh06845@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Do you have any idea why you used the column in the GIST code?
>
> Its use in GiST is ancient ... Oleg didn't add it.

OK, I propose the following patch to remove pg_index.indhaskeytype.

The value was always TRUE, so the GIST tests are removed so the code is
always run. Regression runs fine.

I will keep the patch for a day and apply it if no one objects.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 8.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-15 22:08:50 Re: Re: GIST question
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-15 19:18:10 Fix for SQLStatistics