Re: SunOS4

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SunOS4
Date: 2001-03-01 05:05:57
Message-ID: 20010301140557F.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > I have committed massive changes for SunOS4 port. Tested on:
> > SunOS 4.1.4
> > Vine Linux 2.1 (variant of RedHat Linux 6.2J)
> > FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE
> > Please let me know if I have broken something.
>
> Everything still builds and passes regression on HPUX, but I concur with
> Peter that the HAVE_OPTARG configure stuff must be unnecessary. Please
> observe that
> src/backend/bootstrap/bootstrap.c
> src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
> src/backend/tcop/postgres.c
> src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c
> src/bin/psql/startup.c
> src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/ecpg.c
> all seem to be getting along fine with no configure test. There are
> also a bunch of contrib modules that use optarg, and would also need
> to be changed if you want to apply a configure test.
>
> I suggest reverting the configure and config.h changes and instead
> making pg_restore and pg_id follow the coding practices used in the
> above-mentioned files for optarg.
>
> regards, tom lane

done.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2001-03-01 08:06:46 AW: Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-01 03:30:19 Re: Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ...